Mattresses, classified by the applicant under HSN 940429, supplied by the applicant in the State of Tamil Nadu to any hostel of educational institutions in other State is liable to IGST @ 18% vide serial number 438 under Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017 IT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended by Notification No.43/2017 IT(Rate) dated 14.11.2017.
In re KTV Health Food Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Tamilnadu) The Mahara Jyothi oil, which is an edible RBD Palmolein without any additives or mixture of other oils, is classifiable under 1511 90 20. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU 1. KTV HEALTH FOOD PVT LTD, No.7/3, ARUL NAGAR SALAI, KODUNGAIYUR, […]
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Expenses of Management of Insurers transacting General or Health Insurance business) Regulations, 2023
Ayann Traders Vs State of U.P. And 3 Others (Allahabad high court) It is a case where taxing authorities, after intercepting the goods of the petitioner on 18.04.2018, had detained the same and issued notice to both the selling and purchasing dealer. When no reply was filed, a seizure order was passed imposing 100% penalty, […]
Vikas Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT held that if the cash deposited in assessee’s bank account has already been taxed in the hands of M/s. Kareem’s Hospitality Pvt. Ltd (employer of assessee) or in the hands of the director of the assessee company Mr. Kareem Dhanani then no addition is warranted in the hands […]
Transindia Freight Services Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT held that going by the principle of consistency in the stand taken by the Revenue in earlier as well as subsequent assessment years in scrutiny assessment proceedings, we hold that the income received from car rental of Rs.6,00,000/- is to be assessed as “income from […]
In re Punjab State Corporation Power Limited (GST AAAR Punjab) The appeal raised a question of the admissibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC), indicating a possible misinterpretation of clauses under subsection (2) of Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017. The contention lies in whether the application was evaluated under the correct clause, considering the […]
Ashok Kumar Garg Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) According to the petitioner, although the amount of alleged bogus purchase bills has been quantified as Rs.24,10,705/- the amount in issue is only Rs.13,73,503/-. It is, thus, the petitioner’s case that Rs.10,37,202/- has been wrongly included. Mr Puneet Rai, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf […]
The issue in the present appeal relates to the exigibility of penalty u/s 271B for failure of the assessee to get accounts audited in respect of the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration as required u/s 44AB and furnished to the Assessing Officer before specified due date i.e. due date for filing the return of income.
Chandrakant Tatoba Patil Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune) ITAT noted that on an examination of the assessment record, the PCIT found abnormal increase in cash deposits during demonetization period as compared to pre-demonetization period. According to the PCIT, during the period from 09-11-2016 to 31-12-2016, the assessee deposited cash amounting to Rs.1,43,81,225/- which is inclusive of […]
