PCIT Vs Smt. Sarojini M. Kushe (Karnataka High Court) In the present case, Assessing Officer has adopted the rate of Rs. 1600/- per square feet merely based on the letter given by the developer which is not supported with any particulars. It cannot be ruled out the possibility of the developer giving an inflated figure […]
Rattan Lal Bhardwaj Vs State Of Himachal Pradesh (Himachal Pradesh High Court) Article 39(d) of the Constitution of India provides for equal pay for equal work. This right of the person for equal pay for equal work is recognized as a fundamental right by various pronouncements of the Apex Court and the law is settled […]
Kamla Chandrasingh Kabali Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT find that the claim of the assessee that she has declared income under the IDS 2016 cannot be a tenable explanation as the declaration was not supported by payment of due taxes on the income declared and, therefore, it was an invalid declaration. No other reasonable cause […]
Surani Steel Tubes Limited Vs ITO (Gujarat High Court) High Court noted that the entire base for reopening assessment is on the premise that there was ‘information’ supplied by the Investigation Wing and the Assessing Officer has made cursorily reference to high value transaction of Rs.26,42,027/- as well as also referred to accommodation entry entered […]
Dr. E.S. Krishnamoorthy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) The facts with regard to ownership of property by three co-owners and their respective share in right and interest in the property is not in dispute. As admitted by the assessee himself, he owned 42.5% share in the property. The land owners have received two flats measuring 4092 […]
Venture Lighting India Vs ACIT / DCIT (ITAT Chennai) ITAT noted that the assessee is consistently following a policy and method of accounting admitting foreign exchange gain or loss on year-on-year basis. The assessee before us filed complete chart from assessment year 2010-11 to 2016-17 as noted above. Before us, the ld. Senior DR could […]
ACIT Vs Shri. Mohamed Hassan (ITAT Chennai) Section 251(1)(a) of the Act does not provide power to the Ld. CIT(A) for setting aside the matter to the file of the Ld. AO. The power given to the Ld. CIT(A) in terms of section 251(1)(a) of the Act relates to confirming, reducing, enhancing or annulling the […]
Shri Narayan Rane launches MSME Innovative Scheme (Incubation, Design and IPR) & MSME IDEA HACKATHON 2022 under MSME Champions Scheme Union Minister for MSME Shri Narayan Rane today launched the MSME Innovative Scheme (Incubation, Design and IPR) along with the MSME IDEA HACKATHON 2022. Speaking on the occasion Shri Rane said MSMEs have an important role to […]
All students who have completed their final/professional examination of the ICSI, but could not undergo practical training due to their job constraints and were therefore unable to become the Member of the Institute, can apply for exemption from practical training on the basis of their work experience provided that the applicant is eligible for granting exemption from training as per the requirement of the Company Secretaries Regulations, 1982
Temporary Relaxation for complying with the requirement of Pre-Examination Test and One Day Orientation Programme for enrollment to June, 2022 session of CS Examinations
