Counsel for the Union of India has vehemently opposed the bad application. It is contended that fake firms were created for claiming input tax credit. From the investigation, it is revealed that the firms were fake. The proprietor and owner of the firms are not traceable. It is further contended that evasion of tax has an effect on the economy of the Nation and Court should not be liberal in granting bail to such offenders.
In re GDCL – EMIT JV (GST AAR Uttarakhand) i) Outward supply of Operation & Maintenance of sewerage treatment plant of 26 MLD capacity at LakkarGhat, Rishikesh, Dehradun, State of Uttarakhand to Uttarakhand PeyJal Nigam is not exempted under notification no. 2/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 25.01.2018 and 2/2018 – Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 25.01.2018 and 138/2018/18(20)/XXVII(8)/2017/CTR-2, […]
Business owners, professionals, and individuals collect digital assets for various purposes. Examples of digital assets include documents, videos, audio recordings, and images. Assets in a digital format offer many more benefits than physical assets, such as paper documents, VHS tapes, and photographs. One benefit is easier storage. Instead of needing a large space to store […]
SKJ Finvest Advisory Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) Mr. Nainawati, the learned counsel appearing for the writapplicant submits that his client shall maintain the minimum balance of Rs.22 lac in the bank account which has been attached by the department. According to Mr. Nainawati, at the time of attachment of the […]
Sony Pictures Networks India Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) By means of this stay application, the appellant seeks to get extension of demand amounting to Rs.71,12,41,378/- already stayed by the Tribunal for the assessment year 2010-11, till the disposal of appeal. The Ld. counsel for the appellant submits that the Tribunal vide its order […]
Master Direction provides necessary guidelines for the regulated entities to set up a robust governance structure and implement common minimum standards of security controls for digital payment products and services.
Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax Vs. Kamla Town Trust reported in (1996) 84 Taxman 248 (SC) held that the rectification shall not have retrospective effect and would operate prospectively from the date when the rectification saw the light of the day.
Jsk Marketing Limited & Anr Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) A conjoint reading of Section 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 70 & 174 of the CGST Act show that though the Central Excise Act and the Finance Act, 1994 to […]
Model Educational Loan Scheme for Pursuing Higher Education in India & Abroad 2021 provides broad guidelines to the banks for operationalising the Educational loan scheme and the implementing bank will have the discretion to make changes as deemed fit
Harish Kumar Rampal Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) (Patiala House Court) On behalf of accused, It was submitted that accused is in judicial custody since 03.02.2021. It is submitted that applicant is 62 years of age and a CA by profession and also having proprietorship firm under the name & style of M/s […]
