Vageesh Umesh Jaiswal Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The whole object of issuing a show-cause notice is to make the recipient of the notice understand what the authority is trying to convey and what are the nature of the allegations. In the case on hand, when there are allegations of bogus billing, it […]
South Gujarat Textile Processors Association Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) 1. The draft amendment, as prayed for, is allowed. The necessary incorporation shall be carried out at the earliest. 2. We have heard Mr. S.S. Iyer, the learned counsel appearing for the writ applicants and Mr. Lodha, the learned standing counsel appearing for […]
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India had set up a working group to make recommendations on Loss Prevention and Minimisation in the general insurance industry
Our attention has been drawn to a recent pronouncement of this High Court in the case of Dharamshil Agencies vs. Union of India, Special Civil Application No.8255 of 2019 decided on 23.07.2021 wherein a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court observed that the exercise of pre-consultation should not be a mere eye-wash. Pre-consulation should be meaningful.
PPG Coatings India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) It was submitted that SAP license was purchased by the AE at Netherland in bulk quantities. A copy of the agreement entered into between the said AE and the third party along with the copy of the debit note raised by the AE was submitted. It […]
Persons employed or identified by the research entity as research analyst including its head of research are required to be in compliance of the limitation on trading as stipulated under the RA Regulations.
Hyundai Motor India Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Chennai) The next issue that came up for consideration from ground No. 6 of assessee appeal is disallowance u/s.43B(c) of the Act, in respect of performance incentive paid to employees. Facts with regard to impugned dispute are that for the financial year relevant to the assessment year 2016-17, […]
Devarajan Raman Vs Bank of India Limited (Supreme Court of India) The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India has issued a circular on 12 June 2018. The circular, inter alia, requires the insolvency professional to ensure that the fees payable to him during the CIRP are reasonable and the approval of the CoC for the […]
Supreme Court held in the case of M/s Westinghouse Saxby Farmer Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolkata that the ‘relays’ are classifiable as parts of ‘railway signalling equipment’, under Heading 8608 of the Central Excise Tariff. In holding so, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has given precedence to the ‘sole or principal use’ test of Section Note 3 over the Note 2(f) to Section XVII which specifically excluded ‘electric equipment’ from being classified under Section XVII, whether or not it is identifiable as being for the goods of that Section.
Exposure Draft of AS 28, Accounting for Associates and Jointly Controlled Entities set out principles and procedures for recognising the effects of the investments in associates and to set out the requirements for application of the equity method when accounting for investments in associates and joint controlled entities.
