Recovery of notice pay from dues of employee / payment of notice pay by the employee who could not serve the notice for the period as per contractual agreement / appointment letter does not amount to supply and therefore as per Section 7 (1A) of the CGST Act, 2017, the provisions of Schedule II does not come into play.
Govt. amends the guidelines for registration of existing enterprise under MSME Ministry Notification dated June 26, 2020; States that the existing enterprises (MSMEs) registered prior to June 30, 2020, shall continue to be valid for a period up to March 31, 2022 (earlier, March 31, 2021): Ministry of MSMEs
Synfab Sales And Industries Ltd. Vs C.C.E & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad) From the plain reading of the above rule 11(3) (i) (ii) it is clear that in terms of Clause (ii) of Rule 11(3) the balance credit shall lapse only if the assessee availed an exemption which is absolutely and exempted which is other than […]
Vodafone Idea Ltd. Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) The entire basis for proposing to reopen, as can be seen from the reasons, is on the documents and submissions which were available before the Assessing Officer, before passing of the original assessment order. In fact, in the reasons, it is also recorded that the same issue […]
Sunrise Traders Vs C.C.-Mundra (CESTAT Ahmedabad) To decide the correct classification of goods the commissioner held the Subheading 540751 to 540754 cover “other woven fabric, containing 85% or more weight of textured polyester filaments. For that the authority has relied upon report of ATIRA stating the fabric is made entirely of texturised yarn to be […]
Abdul Wahab Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The specific words which arouse ITATs concern are the allegation that the CIT(A) order under challenge is alleged to have been passed in routine, arbitrary and whimsical manner having no sustainability in law. On-going through the record in the specific case ITAT find that none of the above allegations […]
G.T. Girish Vs Y. Subba Raju (D) By LRs (Supreme Court of India) 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellants are defendant 1(a), defendant 1(b) and second defendant in a Suit filed for specific performance. Defendant 1(a) and Defendant 1(b) have filed SLP(C)No.6858/2017 while defendant No.2 has filed SLP(C)No.6857/2017. The Trial Court while refusing specific performance, […]
Person responsible for collection and payment of securities transaction tax in case of Insurance Company.- In the case of an insurance company, the person responsible for collection and payment of securities transaction tax in accordance with sub-sections (2), (3) and (4) of section 100 of the Act, shall be the managing director or a whole-time director, as defined in clauses (54) and (94) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), duly authorised by the Board of Directors of such company in this behalf.
ThoughtWorks Technologies (India) Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) As per clause 4 of the agreement between the assessee and the First Leasing (lessor) the asset shall remain the exclusive property of the lessor (First Leasing) at all times. It further provides that the lessee at no time during the lease period can capitalize the […]
Section 144B | Faceless Assessment- An assessee has a vested right to personal hearing and same has to be given, if an assessee asks for it. The right to personal hearing cannot depend upon the facts of each case.
