In re Keshav Projects (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) Whether the Supply of Manpower for preparation and serving of spot Electricity Bills’ services provided to Andhra Pradesh Central Power Distribution Corporation Limited for Andhra Pradesh Rural Electrification including distribution of electricity (APCPDCL) can be termed as ‘Pure Services’ as referred in SI.No.3- (Chapter 99) of table […]
AAR held that administering of COVID-19 vaccination by hospitals is a Composite supply, wherein the principal supply is the ‘sale of vaccine’ and the auxiliary supply is the service of ‘administering the vaccine’ and the total transaction is taxable at the rate of principal supply i.e, 5%.
NCLT after appreciating the fact held that demand notice had to be taken to be validly served if delivered at the previous registered address prior to recording of change of address in records of the Registrar of Companies.
Tender Document for Appointment of Concurrent Auditor for the Financial Year 2022-2023 to 2024-2025 for conducting concurrent audit of Treasury Department / International Banking Division & Amount taken under, Depositor Education & Awareness Fund of The Maharashtra State Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Head Office, Fort, Mumbai. THE MAHARASHTRA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., Sir Vitthaldas Thackersey Memorial […]
Empanelment of Chartered Accountants/ firms for concurrent audit assignment of Jalore Nagrik Sahkari Bank Ltd. Jalore Terms and conditions 1. JNSB invites applications from practicing Firms of Chartered Accountants, who are willing to have their Firm empanelled as Concurrent auditor of the bank. 2. Applicant should be a Chartered Accountant with minimum standing of 2 […]
Ashok Kumar Tyagi Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT held that the addition of agricultural income as income from other sources was not based on any incriminating/seized material found as a result of search. Even, the disallowance of loss claimed against house property income is also not with reference to any seized material. It is a […]
Smt. Sarita Kashyap Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi) A scrutiny of the assessment order would clearly reveal that it is not a case where the Assessing Officer has passed the order mechanically without any inquiry and proper application of mind. Whereas, learned PCIT has considered the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue […]
Sandeep Modi Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) It is noted that the assessee has taken a life insurance policy in AY 2012-13 of the SBI of sum assured to the tune of Rs.10,88,000/- (along with credit bonus of 3.25%) by paying single premium of Rs.10,00,000/-. And in this year (AY 2017-18), the assessee received the LIC […]
In re Anil Khirwal (GST AAR Jharkhand) The applicant sought Advance Ruling on the three questions i.e,- 1. What is the classification of service provided by the State of Jharkhand to the petitioner for which Royalty is being paid in light of the notifications mentioned below? 2. What is the GST Rate applicable on given […]
Pushpam Reality Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that these impugned assessments orders have been passed either without proper service of Show Cause Notices or without giving adequate opportunity to reply to the Show Cause Notices. It is therefore submitted that the impugned orders have been passed […]
