Sh. Vinod E Vs Bollineni Developers Ltd. (NAA) Applicant alleged that the Respondent Bollineni Developers Ltd. had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price of the Flat No. J 703, 7th floor purchased from the Respondent in his project ‘Bollineni Silas’, situated at Sadarmangala, K […]
Union Commerce and Industry Minister Shri Piyush Goyal attended Listing Celebration of 400th company in BSE SME Platform in Mumbai today.
Direct Tax collections up to 8th October, 2022 show that gross collections are at Rs. 8.98 lakh crore which is 23.8% higher than the gross collections for the corresponding period of last year.
Seeking of comments / feedback on the XBRL being introduced for submission of Announcements pertaining to Outcome of Board Meeting (Dividend, Buyback, Bonus shares and Voluntary Delisting)
Smt. Renu Mittal w/o Mool Chand Mittal Vs Anant Raj Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the Report are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed application before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 and submitted that she had purchased flat in the Respondent No. l’s Project […]
Sh. Deepak Garg Vs JKG Construction Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The present Report dated 31.08.2021 had been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the […]
Rajesh Shaw Vs Eden Realty Ventures Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) The Applicant No.1 Rajesh Shaw alleged that the Respondent No. 1 Eden Realty Ventures Pvt. Ltd. had not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in prices and charged GST @12% on the amount due to him against payments made for […]
ITAT held that Income Tax reassessment initiated on the basis of borrowed satisfaction without any independent application of mind by Assessing Officer is liable to be quashed.
ITAT held that additions framed on account of undisclosed income being sustained in part is justified, where assessee was required to file complete details of such friends and relatives and also the details of sales but the same has not been done at any stage.
A R Transport Vs ADIT (ITAT Jabalpur) Amended provisions of Section 154 cannot be applied with retrospective effect in respect of an AY which precedes the year of amendment of the provisions
