Free import policy of items under HS code 15119010, 15119020 and 15119090 is extended beyond 31.12.2022 until further orders vide Notification No. 51/2015-2020-DGFT | Dated: 28th December 2022 Government of India Ministry of Commerce & Industry Department of Commerce Directorate General of Foreign Trade New Delhi Notification No. 51/2015-2020-DGFT | Dated: 28th December 2022 Subject: Amendment […]
Procedure for allocation of Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQ) in line with the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Notification no. 66/2022-Customs dated 26th December 2022 under Ind-Aus ECTA is notified. Government of India Ministry of Commerce and Industry Department of Commerce Directorate General of Foreign Trade Vanijya Bhawan New Delhi Public Notice No. 46/2015-20-DGFT | Dated […]
Company has failed to comply with the below mentioned provisions of Section 42 of the Companies Act, 2013 also: (a) Company did not pass any Board Resolution for approval of Private Placement. (b) Company did not circulate the letter of offer to the proposed allottees in PAS-4 or not maintained any records of the offer in PAS-5
Details of products falling under the jurisdiction of the Export Promotion Council for EOU and SEZ (EPCES) has been updated in Appendix 2T of FTP 2015-2020, with immediate effect. Government of India Ministry of Commerce & Industry Department of Commerce Directorate General of Foreign Trade Vanijya Bhawan New Delhi Public Notice No. 45 /2015-2020-DGFT | […]
Extension of validity of project registration under MAHARERA would be granted, on promoters complying with the directions issued under Order No. 7 of 2019 dated 08.02.2019.
As per prosecution case, some unknown persons entered into the house of the informant and told that they are Income Tax Officials and thereafter they started searching his house. The accused persons took away rupees twenty lacs alongwith gold jwellery.
Explore Apar Industries vs Union of India case in Bombay High Court. Petition on transition and distribution of CENVAT Credit. Key details and court directives.
B M Autolink Vs C.C.E.-Kutch (Gandhidham) (CESTAT Ahmedabad) We find that the fact is not under dispute that the appellant being a dealer purchase the vehicles from M/s. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. and subsequently sell the same to various customers. The transaction between M/s. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. and the dealer and subsequently sale transaction […]
(1) These rules may be called the Central Goods and Services Tax (Fifth Amendment) Rules, 2022. (2) Save as otherwise provided in these rules, they shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
Considering the provision of Section 68 that the assessee has to prove three conditions i.e. (i) identity of the creditor; (2) capacity of such creditor to advance money; and (iii) genuineness of the transactions. If all the aforesaid three conditions are proved, the burden shifts on the revenue to prove that the amount belong to the assessee. However, the assessee cannot be asked to prove source of source or the origin of origin.
