Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Subscription Books Submit Post
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law Are Electronically Signed Agreements Valid in India? Corporate Law Share Purchase Agreement: Key Terms and Risks Income Tax CBDT Relief on TDS Demand for Inoperative PAN Under Section 206AA Income Tax ITAT Allows Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS 2019 Compensation Company Law NCLT Dismisses SFIO Disgorgement Plea Over ₹100.50 Crore Aircel Call Option Payment Service Tax CESTAT Kolkata Sets Aside Service Tax Demand on Insurance Commission Under RCM Goods and Services Tax AP HC Quashes GST Demands After Omission of Rule 96(10) Without Saving Clause Goods and Services Tax Kerala HC Quashes GST ITC Denial, Directs Reconsideration Under Retrospective Section 16(5)
Editor

Editor

Contributing Author
Name: Editor Qualification: Graduate Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Articles Published: 12,844 Total Views: 89,843,583
Articles by this Author
Corporate LawPrinciples of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectaion would not apply to allot shops by Municipality contrary to Rules of allotment
Corporate Law

Principles of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectaion would not apply to allot shops by Municipality contrary to Rules of allotment

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawPerson detained in jail despite release order by appellate Court is entitled for compensation of his illegal detention for breach of his fundamental right under Article 21 of Constitution of India
Corporate Law

Person detained in jail despite release order by appellate Court is entitled for compensation of his illegal detention for breach of his fundamental right under Article 21 of Constitution of India

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawVehicle seized under Section 39(1)(d) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 cannot be property of the Government unless finding is recorded by Criminal Court that vehicle is used for commission of offence.
Corporate Law

Vehicle seized under Section 39(1)(d) of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 cannot be property of the Government unless finding is recorded by Criminal Court that vehicle is used for commission of offence.

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawHazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016
Corporate Law

Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawAgreement providing for arbitaration by the CG Arbitaration Tribunal. Section 9 and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would not apply
Corporate Law

Agreement providing for arbitaration by the CG Arbitaration Tribunal. Section 9 and 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 would not apply

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawCadre post of Labour Commissioner to be filled by cadre officer (member of IAS), cannot be filled by member of IFS.
Corporate Law

Cadre post of Labour Commissioner to be filled by cadre officer (member of IAS), cannot be filled by member of IFS.

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawNational Coal Wage Agreement (NCWA) has a force of law; terms of NCWA should be fair and reasonable and should not be opposed to law
Corporate Law

National Coal Wage Agreement (NCWA) has a force of law; terms of NCWA should be fair and reasonable and should not be opposed to law

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawA person suspected of an offence cannot be forced to undergo Narco-analysis, BEAP and polygraph tests without his consent
Corporate Law

A person suspected of an offence cannot be forced to undergo Narco-analysis, BEAP and polygraph tests without his consent

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawPetitioners/dealers carrying-on their business in railway area are liable to pay entry tax under the Chhattisgarh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976.
Corporate Law

Petitioners/dealers carrying-on their business in railway area are liable to pay entry tax under the Chhattisgarh Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976.

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawCourts should not make adverse remarks agianst party/litigant unless really necessary for just decision of case and opportunity of hearing should be afforded before making such remarks
Corporate Law

Courts should not make adverse remarks agianst party/litigant unless really necessary for just decision of case and opportunity of hearing should be afforded before making such remarks

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawLok Aayog has no jurisdiction and authority to pass orders directing departmental enquiry and consequent recovery, it can only make recommendations for such an action.
Corporate Law

Lok Aayog has no jurisdiction and authority to pass orders directing departmental enquiry and consequent recovery, it can only make recommendations for such an action.

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawJurisdiction to directly take cognizance of offence under SC / ST Act
Corporate Law

Jurisdiction to directly take cognizance of offence under SC / ST Act

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawMere order of ‘acquittal’ in order sheet is not judgment
Corporate Law

Mere order of ‘acquittal’ in order sheet is not judgment

Editor10 years ago
Corporate LawSelection on the post of District Judge (Entry Level) has to be made in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Higher Judicial Service (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2006.
Corporate Law

Selection on the post of District Judge (Entry Level) has to be made in accordance with the Chhattisgarh Higher Judicial Service (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2006.

Editor10 years ago