(1) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 23,04,369 by considering the same to be service tax? (2) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 53,600 made under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
It is clarified that the term Duty used in respect of the items listed in Appendix 3A is to be read as Basic Customs duties only and not all Customs duties (including BCD=SAD/IGST)
Seeks to further amend notification No. 50/2017- Customs dated 30.06.2017 so as to: i. increase basic customs duty (BCD) on shelled Almonds [0802 12 00] from Rs.65/Kg to Rs.100/Kg ii. increase basic customs duty (BCD)on wheat [1001 19 00, 1001 99 10] from present 20% to 30%. iii increase basic customs duty (BCD) on Protein concentrates [2106 10 00] from 10% to 40%.
Seeks to increase tariff rate of basic customs duty (BCD) on Walnuts in shell [0802 31 00 ] from 30% to 100% and increase tariff rate of basic customs duty (BCD) on Protein concentrates and textured protein substances [2106 10 00] from 30% to 40% by invoking section 8A (1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
You are requested to direct the Principal Commissioners/ Commissioners under your jurisdiction to not transfer/amend the authorization without the express approval of the Board. It is reiterated that all Petitions, specifically GST related petitions, should be efficaciously defended by the authorized Commissioners. The contents of this Instruction may also be bought to the notice of concerned field formations under your jurisdiction.
hese are the three appeals filed by the revenue for Assessment Year 2007-08 to 2009-10. The assessee has filed cross objections in all these appeals making it a bunch of six appeals. All these six appeals involved common grounds pertaining to the respondent and therefore, they are disposed of by this common order.
DGFT clarifies whether the actual service providers rendering the eligible services should be entitled for the SFIS/SEIS benefits or the aggregator of services (Ports).
Shaan Construction P Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT noted that whole exercise carried out by the assessee is simply a devise to introduce unaccounted money through various shell companies in the form of share capital at a premium. The manner of issue of the shares through these companies, the manner of providing confirmation on […]
GSTR-5A is a Return to be furnished by Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval (OIDAR) services provider to un-registered person or customers, on the GST Portal for the services provided from a place outside India to a person in India, other than a registered person.
This appeal by assessee under section 253 of Income-tax Act is directed against the order of Commissioner (Appeals)-35 Mumbai dated 4th September 2012, which in turn arises from assessment order passed under section 143(3) on 26 December 2008 for assessment year 2006-07. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal
