Explore the ITAT Visakhapatnam’s resolution in the case of Smt. Sabhapathi Padmasree vs. ITO regarding deemed dividends. Learn how collateral security provided by the assessee impacted the tax treatment of loans and advances under section 2(22)(e).
Explore the ITAT Chennai resolution in the case of Shri Krishnapandian Balaji vs. DCIT regarding unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. Learn how the assessee justified the source as rental income.
ITAT Chennai ruled in favor of Om Balaji Stores, finding no justification for disallowance u/s 40A(3). Detailed analysis of the case and the importance of documentary evidence.
In exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub-section (2) of section 92C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961)(hereafter referred to as the said Act), read with proviso to sub-rule (7) of rule 10CA of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the Central Government hereby notifies that where the variation between the arms length price determined under section 92C of the said Act and the price at which the international transaction or specified domestic transaction has actually been undertaken does not exceed one per cent.
Explore the case of Rakesh Roshan vs. State of Bihar in the Patna High Court, delving into the quashing of tax demands, violation of natural justice, and the importance of fair hearings.
Dive into the dispute of Acmechem Ltd vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Mumbai). Explore challenges to value rejection, breaches of natural justice, and a crucial assessment analysis.
Lonsen Kiri Chemical Industries Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad) In the present case, the assessee being 100% EOU, imported goods exempted under Notification No. 50/2003-Cus. There is no dispute about the intention of the said goods to be used in the manufacture of final product in the 100% EOU unit […]
HC held that this Court while exercising jurisdiction under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act cannot be called upon to reexamine the facts or to re-appreciate the tenor and ambit of the document which was placed before the Assessing Officer, CITA and more importantly the Tribunal has noted that the assessee has failed to establish the reimbursement which was pleaded by producing document despite opportunity being given at the appellate stage.
Calcutta High Court quashes IT notice against Tinplate Company, citing change of opinion in assessing officer approach. Detailed analysis and implications.
2.1. KYC records of all existing clients (who have used Aadhaar as an OVD) shall be validated within a period of 180 days from August 01, 2022. 2.2. The validation of all KYC records (new and existing) shall commence from August 01, 2022.
