The breach relates to the absence of signatures from any directors on the company’s Balance Sheet for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2021. Following a hearing, penalties were levied: the company was fined Rs. 3,00,000, while each director, Mr. Veerendra Kumar Vishwakarma and Ms. Neelam Gautam, faced fines of Rs. 50,000 each.
Mere non availability of stock register cannot be sufficient to reject trading results when the audited final accounts and other sources including the VAT data are available to cross verify the trading results including the sales verification.
Daeseung Autoparts India Pvt.Ltd Vs ACIT (OSD) (ITAT Chennai) We have gone through reasons given by the Assessing Officer to reject additional depreciation on capitalization of forex loss in light of provisions of section 32(1)(iia) of the Act, and we ourselves do not subscribe to the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the assessee […]
Himanshu Gupta Vs Vs. Narayana Reddy (Karnataka High Court) In terms of Section 421 of the Cr.P.C., a fine can be recovered in a manner as depicted hereinabove. Therefore, non-payment of compensation ensues dire consequences. The scheme of the provision being thus, though no application is filed, the Court may grant interim compensation, but it […]
ACIT Vs Dharmapuri District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (ITAT Chennai) The material facts are that during assessment proceedings, the assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) was examined by Ld. AO. As per the statutory provisions, the assessee was entitled to claim deduction for an amount not exceeding 7.5% of total income and an amount not […]
Dhanalakshmi Mills Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) Admittedly, the Assessing Officer has caused necessary inquiries with regard to computation of long term capital gain derived transfer of property and has computed capital gain by taking into account cost of acquisition claimed by the assessee without disturbing consideration received from transfer of property, even though, there […]
ITO Vs 67th Annual Conference of CSI-2015 (ITAT Chennai) ITAT noted that the payments made by the assessee entity in accordance with bye-laws / specific purpose for which it was constituted and the AO has not disputed the nature of contribution made by assessee or the receipts transferred being directly in nexus with the income […]
Koshambh Charitable Trust Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) We have given our thoughtful consideration and perused the materials available on record, as well as the Paper Book filed by the assessee. As it can be seen from page no. 32 of the paper book which is the screenshot of the Income Tax portal wherein for the […]
Sara Investments Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The contentions of the assessee are that the assessee firm was holding less than 10% of shares in SSPL. It had paid for 9.38% of the shares only which are held in the name of partner Mr. V.K. Dhawan and the partners are holding the shares in their personal […]
Mayank Kumar Garg Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) It was submitted by the ld Counsel for the Assessee that the addition of Rs. 16,82,836/- has been made without giving any opportunity of hearing for enhancement of the income. The ld DR could not controvert this arguments. In the light of the aforesaid irregularity and violation of […]
