In re Supertron Electronics Pvt. Ltd (CAAR Delhi) It is evident that the projectors in question are designed for use with an automatic data processing machine. It also appears that the subject goods has got additional ports which may make it capable of being a video projector, classifiable under 85286900. In this regard, it may […]
The Institute of Company Secretaries of India has approved the ICSI Social Audit Standards covering all the sixteen areas of activities listed by the Regulatory Authorities, where a Social Enterprise can operate to be eligible to register on the Social Stock Exchanges. The same can be accessed at: https://www.icsi.edu/media/webmodules/ICSI_Social_Audit_Standards.pdf The ICSI has set up The […]
In re The Indian Hume Pipe Company Limited (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) It is observed by the members of the authority for advance ruling that, audit was initiated by the jurisdictional authority under section 65 of the CGST act, 2017 and APGST act 2017,to verify all the issues regarding the business activities of the applicant […]
Gujarat High Court allows Apex Formulations Pvt Ltd’s petition challenging CGST appeal on refund denial. Remands to Appellate Authority for fresh consideration.
Dhampur Sugar Mills Ltd Vs Commissioner Of Customs And Central Excise (Allahabad High Court) Allahabad High Court heard learned counsel for parties and having perused the record, prima facie, it cannot be disputed that the issue on which adjudication was sought to be made and the issue that has been adjudicated appear to be different. […]
Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd Vs Parag Sheth & Ors (NCLAT Delhi) It is observed that direction issued by the Adjudicating Authority are final direction allowing an application filed by the RP without issuing notice to the Appellant. Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the directions could not have been issued without hearing […]
The issue to be decided is whether the rejection of the request to transfer the cenvat credit balance to the lessee unit is legal and proper.
In absence of any incriminating documents seized during search, AO is not justified in making addition in non-abated assessment orders u/S 153-A r/W Sec 143(3) of Income Tax Act of 1961.
Panexcell Clinical Lab Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT find that the assessee is in the business of drug analysis, clinical trials, and other research activities and as part of the said business, the assessee does lab study of various drugs before their launch in the market. As per the assessee, for the purpose […]
Assessee gets his accounts audited & furnished section 44AB audit report before finalization of assessment order, so section 271B Penalty deleted
