Read how ITAT Mumbai imposes a cost of Rs 5,000 on Edifice Properties Pvt Ltd for non-compliance with notices in their appeal against the CIT(A) order.
Discover how CESTAT Kolkata ruled in favor of Guru Shipping & Clearing Pvt Ltd, waiving penalties due to a lack of evidence for tax evasion. Full text of the order.
CESTAT Chennai sets aside excise duty demand on silk yarn, ruling that the transaction value cannot be rejected without cogent reasons. Full text of the order.
Kerala High Court directs readjudication of input tax credit (ITC) claim, stating that discrepancies between GSTR 2A and GSTR 3B alone cannot be grounds for denial
Explore the Bagadiya Brothers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Kolkata) case regarding the determination of duty on iron ore fines based on WMT.
Explore the case of Commissioner of Customs (Port) vs. B R Marbles Pvt Ltd (CESTAT Kolkata) where penalties and interest were waived due to court-ordered delays.
Explore the case of Alankit Imaginations Ltd vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi), where penalties were challenged. Learn why a ‘non-cooperative attitude’ alone cannot justify penalties.
CESTAT held that here is no liability to pay tax under Commercial or Industrial Construction Service on construction of Dykes, Internal Roads and other civil miscellaneous works during the period under dispute which is prior to 01.06.2007
SEBI has extended timeline for top-listed entities to verify, confirm, deny, or clarify market rumours as per the LODR Regulations.
Applicant inquired about time of supply for work executed from September 2010 to June 2017. Ruling clarified that the time of supply is date on which consideration or payment is received.
