Ruskin Chemipharm vs. ACIT: ITAT Mumbai orders re-examination of disallowed interest paid to partners due to a mistake in Tax Audit Report. Detailed analysis here.
Acqueon Technologies Pvt. Ltd vs. Commissioner of Customs: CESTAT Chennai allows customs duty refund despite invoice error. Detailed analysis and precedent cited.
CESTAT Mumbai’s ruling in Krishna Consultancy vs. Commissioner of CGST highlights that services to foreign universities are not ‘intermediaries’ and qualify as export of services.
Turner Project Management India Pvt. Ltd wins in CESTAT Mumbai case – No service tax on employer’s social security contributions. Detailed analysis and conclusion here.
Explore Circular No. 28/2023-Customs allowing advance assessment of Courier Shipping Bills on ECCS. Enhance trade facilitation and reduce dwell time. Details and updates
Discover key highlights of Reserve Bank of India’s latest IT governance, risk management, and assurance practices. Stay informed on these vital updates
In a case between Giri Bahadur and the Ward, ITAT Mumbai dismisses the appeal, upholding disallowance of late PF/ESIC contributions under Section 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act.
The CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of Hindustan Coca Cola, allowing them a refund and rejecting the concept of unjust enrichment. Learn about the case and its implications.
CESTAT Mumbai clarifies that review proceedings cannot exceed the grounds mentioned in the show-cause notice in Capgemini Technology Service India Ltd vs. Commissioner of CGST. Details of the case.
In the Commissioner of Customs vs Deepak Dialani trademark case, cross-examination was unavailable and the evidence inadmissible. Find out the implications here!
