There is no bar / restriction in the provisions of section 139(5) of the Act that the assessee cannot file a revised return of income after issuance of notice under section 143(2) of the Act. It is trite law, the assessee can file a revised return of income even in course of the assessment proceedings, provided, the time limit prescribed under section 139(5) of the Act is available. That being the case, the revised return of income filed by the assessee under section 139(5) of the Act cannot be held as invalid.
Jindal Dyechem Industries (P) Ltd. Vs Union of India ((Delhi High Court) It is apparent from these facts that the imports which are the subject matter of the present writ petition were in fact made after the introduction of GST Regime. The petitioner is the beneficiary of an advance license issued on 17.07.2017. At that point […]
The fresh release made in the media today under ‘Panama Paper Leaks’ is being promptly looked into by the law enforcement agencies under the aegis of the Multi Agency Group (MAG) already constituted for facilitating coordinated and speedy investigation.
IBBI releases Discussion Paper on Discharge from Responsibility as Interim Resolution Professional, Resolution Professional or Liquidator of the Corporate Processes under the Code for comments
Where an Individual or HUF has deposited or paid any amount as Fixed Deposit in any Scheduled Bank for a term not less than 5 Years in any previous year subject to Scheme framed by Central Government in this behalf then such Individual or HUF is eligible to claim deduction to the extent of Rs. 1,00, 000 (Rs1,50,000 from AY 2015-16 onwards) under section 80C for assessment year relevant to the previous year .
M/s M.K. Enterprises v. State of U.P. & 3 Others (Allahabad High Court) Assessee was not given any opportunity to show cause or give reply to the allegation on which goods had been seized on account of absence of Transit Declaration Form (TDF), it was held that as the petitioner had no notice or opportunity […]
Manu International Vs. State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) Penalty should not be imposed where the assessee is unable to file the GST returns and pay the taxes for technical issues relating to migration. The petitioner is a registered partnership firm under the U.P. VAT Act, 2008. On the enforcement of the GST, it applied […]
A corporate taxpayer engaged in civil works for Central and State Departments as well as for private entities has defaulted in payment Of GST. On the same being point out, the Contractor deposited Rs.3.86 Crores towards their liability.
By the end of 16th June, 2018, Rs.6,087 crore IGST refund has been sanctioned in the refund fortnight. The interesting facts during the second fortnight are (i) about 1,68,191 shipping bills have been processed (ii) IGST refund claims of about 9,293 exporters have been sanctioned including about 3500 new exporters, whose refunds had been held up, have got their refund sanctioned.
CCI approves the acquisition of Monsanto by Bayer AG under Section 31(7) of the Competition Act, 2002, subject to modifications/remedies to address the anti-competitive effects resulting from the said acquisition
