When income which was the foundation on which he based his belief of escapement of income was absent /disappeared then AO’s very usurpation of jurisdiction was on non-existing jurisdictional fact which rendered his usurpation of jurisdiction to reopen the assessment legally untenable and so null in the eyes of law and therefore, the reassessment made by AO without jurisdiction was quashed.
Assessee was not entitled to the benefit of section 54F in respect of the investment made by assessee in purchasing the capital asset (land) as the said purchase of land was not within a period of one year prior to the sale of capital asset or falling in any of the categories in which assessee was entitled to claim exemption u/s.54F.
Running your own business in this climate will surely set you up for success. However, this is only possible when you’re able to give your business the funds it needs over time, be it for working capital, to fill in the gap when you are awaiting a sizeable payment, or to pay for inventories in case an urgent order comes your way.
Have you ever heard of people that get rich by saving? No, because hoarding funds is not a great way to for anyone to maximise their profits. Rather, most people with a massive volume of funds get rich by making sound investments that yield substantial returns. Keeping this in mind, it must be said that […]
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be levied as assessee had proved that there was a reasonable cause for making the wrong claim under section 54 instead of section 54F.
ITAT held that roaming charges paid by the appellant to other telecom companies are not covered under ‘fee for technical service’ and such payments are out of the purview of TDS provision of 194J of the Act.
In absence of registered sale deed, the house boat purchased cannot be said as residential house and hence deduction u/s 54 cannot be allowed. Further The same cannot be equated with the residential house which is immovable property and hence deduction u/s 54 not allowed.
The court ordered the refund due for AY 1993-94 and 1995-96 to be granted to the assessee along with appropriate interest and also ordered a sum of INR 1.50 Lakhs to be paid to the assessee on account of inefficiency and lapse on the part of the department.
Income Tax Department hits at terror financing activities in J&K Region; Conducts sensitive search action at various place. The Head of a prominent Organisation allegedly indulging in anti-national activities along with his associates were covered in a sensitive search action by the Income Tax Department today. Ministry of Finance Income Tax Department hits at terror […]
Assessee submitted that they have not received any carbon credit during the year under consideration i.e. AY 2012-13. Assessee submitted that addition made by AO on account of non-existence income ought to be deleted.
