he Reserve Bank of India has today placed in public domain a draft scheme of reconstruction of the Yes Bank Ltd. The Reserve Bank invites suggestions and comments from members of public, including the banks’ shareholders, depositors and creditors on the draft scheme. The draft scheme has also been sent to Yes Bank Ltd. and State Bank of India for their comments. The suggestions and comments will be received by Reserve Bank of India up to Monday, March 9, 2020. The Reserve Bank will take a final view soon thereafter.
he Central Board recommended crediting of 8.5% annual rate of interest on the EPF accumulations in the EPF members’ accounts for the year 2019-20. The Central Board ratified and appreciated restoration of normal pension after 15 years from the date of commutation, benefitting about 6.3 Lakh pensioners who had opted for commutation under the erstwhile Para 12-A of EPS, 1995 on or before 25.09.2008.
Zone List of Commissionerates, Appellate Commissionerate and Audit Commissionerate Zone Wise in Goods & Services Tax (GST). 1. AHEMDABAD ZONE Ahmedabad North Ahmedabad South Ahmedabad South (Appeals) Ahmedabad (Gandhidham) Bhavnagar Kutch (Gandhidham) Rajkot Rajkot (Appeals) Ahmedabad (Audit) Rajkot (Audit) 2. BANGALORE ZONE Belagvi Bangaluru – East Bangaluru – North Bangaluru – North-west Bangaluru – South […]
Since the reference to Hong Kong as ‘place of arbitration’ was not a simple reference as the ‘venue’ for the arbitral proceedings; but a reference to Hong Kong was for final resolution by arbitration administered in Hong Kong
Vivad se Vishwas Scheme – 2020 has undergone lot of changes and it has been passed by Lok Sabha on 4th March, 2020. It is a welcome scheme and will help reduce pending litigations. The key features of the scheme, after amendments, are as under :
Bimalkumar Manubhai Savalia Vs Bank of India (NCLAT) Conclusion: Proceedings initiated or pending in DRT, either initiated under SARFAESI or under debts and due to Banks and Financial Institutions could not be taken into account for the purposes of limitation. Therefore, the application filed by Bank before the Adjudicating Authority on 30.08.2018 was beyond the […]
Sofina S. A. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Transfer of shares of Singapore Company could not be regarded as a transfer of shares of its Indian subsidiary in absence of see-through approach under clause 13(5) of India Belgium Treaty Conclusion: Gain arising from transfer of shares of A Pte. Ltd., Singapore by the assessee to M/s […]
Sponsorship and endorsement expenses paid by Adidas India to various athletes and players in India were not includable in the assessable value of the goods imported by Adidas India by invoking rule 10(1)(e) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules 2007.
The impugned order rejecting such appeal on the ground of limitation is not sustainable as the petitioner cannot be penalised for lack of clarity of the provision when the new law is enacted.
Provision for Gratuity was an ascertained liability eligible to be deducted from the net profit for the purpose of computing book profit u/s 115JB of the Income Tax Act.
