In Eko India Financial Services (P) Limited vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax in W.P.(C) 5819/2021 dated August 03, 2021 the Hon’ble Delhi High Court directed the Revenue (Respondents) to refund the amount adjusted in excess of 20% of the disputed demand for the Assessment Year (AY). Fact: Eko India Financial Services (P) Limited (Petitioner) […]
In M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT [CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4742-4743 OF 2021 dated August 11, 2021], the issue raised in the appeal is with respect to Section 43B Explanation 3C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act) when a claim of deduction filed by M.M. Aqua Technologies Limited (Appellant) under Section 43B, which was […]
In M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. K. Bharathi and Ors [W.P.No.12957 of 2021 dated August 5, 2021], the petition has been filed under the writ of Mandamus directing the Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal, Chennai (NCLT) to dispose of the application filed by M/s. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited (the Petitioner) in MA No.538 of […]
In Shri Kottoor Mathew Jose Mathew, M/s. Jose Matthew and Co. [Advance Ruling No. KER/123/2021 dated May 31, 2021], Shri Kottoor Mathew Jose Mathew (Applicant) has sought an advance ruling on the following issues: Whether there lies any tax liability on the discount received through credit notes. Consequences of treating credit notes after showing Goods […]
Principal Commissioner of Customs Vs M. D. Overseas Limited (CESTAT Delhi) In this case Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) had set aside the Assessment Order (AO) passed on the three Bills of Entry (BoE) with a further direction for re-assessment of the rate of Basic Customs Duty applicable on the given BoE to the Department. M/s M. […]
HC directed the Adjudicating Authority to consider the prayers of provisional release of seized goods of the assessee, during the pendency of the proceedings under the Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962.
The Hon’ble Uttarakhand Authority for Advance Rulings (UAAR), in the matter of M/s. Midas Foods (P.) Ltd. [Application No. 05 of 2020-21 dated October 15, 2020], held that Overseas Commission Agent is covered within the definition of the term ‘intermediary’ under Section 2(13) of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (the IGST Act). […]
AAAR held that the private coaching institutions imparting education to students facilitating them to obtain qualification like CA,CS, CMA etc., are not covered under the definition of ‘educational institution’ in para 2(y) of the Services Exemption Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017 and hence not eligible to exemption under CGST Act.
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in Greenwood Owners Association v. Union of India [ W.P. Nos. 5518 and 1555 of 2020 dated July 01, 2021] held that contribution by the members of the Resident Welfare Association (RWA) only in excess of Rs. 7500/- per month per member would be taxable under the Goods and Services […]
The Apex Court rejected a plea filed by e-commerce major Amazon and Flipkart (companies) to stall enquiry by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) for anti competition agreements, stating that, ‘as big e-commerce organizations, you should volunteer for anti-trust investigation but you are objecting’. Facts: Delhi Vyapar Mahasangh (“DVM”), an organization of retailers, submitted a […]
