Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Kumar Singhal Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anil Kumar Singhal Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Assessee’s case was reopened u/s 147 based on information that he deposited ₹4.65 crore cash in bank accounts without explaining the source. During reassessment, AO found total deposits of ₹8.21 crore (cash & cheque) and, unsatisfied with Assessee’s explanation of pottery trading, treated the entire sum as unexplained money u/s 69A. Before CIT(A), Assessee argued that deposits represented turnover from his pottery trading business in Khurja. Observing that both deposits & withdrawals existed &that estimation was unavoidable in such tra...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031