Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tapas Kumar Sarkar Vs CIT(A) (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tapas Kumar Sarkar Vs CIT(A) (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata Remands TDS Disallowance Dispute – Advertising Agency Gets Fresh Chance Before CIT(A) Assessee,  an advertising professional, appealed against CIT(A)/NFAC orders confirming disallowances u/s 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS on advertisement & incentive payments. In AY 2012-13,  AO made additions of ₹50.05 lakh (advertisement expenses) & ₹6.24 lakh (incentive payments). In AY 2013-14, ₹81.09 lakh was disallowed on similar grounds. AO held that TDS was deductible u/s 194C on payments to media & u/s 194J on incentive...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Patna ITAT: Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax, Service Tax & Employer’s PF Contribution Allowable; TDS Interest Not Deductible Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031