Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vipul Kamal Prakash Sud Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vipul Kamal Prakash Sud Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) One Residential House Sold Floor-wise Still One Asset – AO Examined 54 Claim in Detail – ITAT Says 263 Not Permissible Assessee filed return declaring total income of ₹3,03,58,490. During assessment u/s 143(3), AO examined the capital gain arising from sale of Assessee’s ½ share in a residential house sold for ₹8.59 crore. Assessee invested the entire Long-Term Capital Gain of ₹5.56 crore in a new residential property  &  claimed deduction u/s 54, which AO accepted after calling for  &  examining details. Assessment was ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Patna ITAT: Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax, Service Tax & Employer’s PF Contribution Allowable; TDS Interest Not Deductible Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031