Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kant Mishra Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kant Mishra Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) PCIT Cannot Invoke Sec.263 for Mere ‘Inadequate Inquiry’ – AO Had Examined Share LTCG; Revision Order Quashed All four assessees filed returns of income for AY 2015-16. Their cases were selected for scrutiny under CASS & assessments were completed u/s 143(3). During assessment, AOs examined all details including purchase/sale of shares & exemption u/s 10(38) on LTCG of approx. ₹36.60 lakh, & accepted the claim after calling for necessary documents. PCIT invoked revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263, holding that: AO had not conducted proper inq...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031