Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Corporate Law

NCLT cannot impel financial creditor to consider settlement proposed by Corporate Debtor

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 9294
Case Name
Punjab National Bank Vs Aban Offshore Ltd (NCLT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
NCLT
Advertisement

Punjab National Bank Vs Aban Offshore Ltd (NCLT Chennai)

NCLT Chennai held that discretionary power on NCLT u/s. 7(5)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be used to impel financial creditor to consider settlement proposed by Corporate Debtor. Accordingly, CIRP against Aban Offshore Limited admitted.

Facts- This petition has been filed by Punjab National Bank, financial creditor on 21.08.2024 under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 through Mr. C.J. Ranjith , Chief Manager for initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in respect of Aban Offshore Limited, the Corporate Debtor (CD).

Conclusion- The current position of law is that while there exists some level of discretion vested on the Adjudicating Authority under Section 7(5)(a), the same must be exercised cautiously. Such discretionary power cannot be used to impel the financial creditor to consider the settlement proposed by the Corporate Debtor.

Held that in view of the fact the ‘financial debt’ is proved by the Financial Creditor and the ‘default’ having been committed on the part of the Corporate Debtor, this Tribunal admits the present petition and initiates the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process in relation to the Corporate Debtor viz., Aban Offshore Limited.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.