Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anguraj Saravana Prabu Vs CIT (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anguraj Saravana Prabu Vs CIT (Madras High Court) Facts- The petitioner, Anguraj Saravana Prabu, engaged in the retail business of coconut coir, filed his income tax return for the assessment year 2018-19 declaring an income of Rs. 24,22,680. His case was selected for scrutiny on grounds of non-furnishing quantitative details and business expenses. The petitioner was issued notices to furnish documentary evidence but failed to respond or produce any documents. The Assessing Officer, therefore, passed an order under Section 144 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act making an addition...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

I am Delhi Delhi-based advocate specializing in tax litigation and advisory, especially to corporates. I represent taxpayers at all tax tribunals and High Courts. we also undertake advisory in Mergers and Acquisitions matters. My contact details are vgrmc2018@gmail.com. 9811728992. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ALP Cannot Be Determined at Nil Without Comparable Analysis: ITAT Ahmedabad No Provision to Replace Actual Land Cost with Market Value for Section 80-IB(10) Deduction: ITAT Chennai ITAT Delhi Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition as Sales Were Recorded ITAT Quashes Section 143(1) Adjustment as No Prior Notice Issued CIT(A) cannot enhance income on issues not examined by AO: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930