This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Dissenting Creditor to be given priority while disbursing payments from Successful Resolution Applicant
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- RBL Bank Limited Vs Sical Logistics Limited (NCLAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
RBL Bank Limited Vs Sical Logistics Limited (NCLAT Chennai)
NCLAT Chennai held that payments from Successful Resolution Applicant will be done on pro-rata basis amongst the creditors but the Dissenting Creditor has to be pad first before other Financial Creditors. Accordingly, appeal stands allowed.
Facts- The Resolution Plan that was approved by Committee of Creditors (CoC) on 29.02.2022, and later on, affirmed by NCLT on 08.12.2022 amounts to payment of 521.82 Crores by the Successful Resolution Applicant (SRA).
The Appellant contended that he is a Dissenting Financial Credi...
Author Info
