Winzo Games Private Limited Vs Google LLC (Competition Commission of India)
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has initiated a detailed probe into Google LLC and its subsidiaries following allegations by Winzo Games Private Limited. The case pertains to Google’s app store, payment systems, and advertising policies, which the Informant claims are discriminatory and violate Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.
Background of the Case
Winzo Games, a digital gaming company operating an online platform for skill-based real money games (RMGs), filed a complaint under Section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act. The Informant alleges that Google’s Developer Distribution Agreement (DDA) and Developer Program Policies (DPP) impose unjust and restrictive terms.
Google’s policy of not listing skill-based RMG apps on its Play Store is at the center of the controversy. Winzo Games contends that the sideloading process, required for users to download their app, presents challenges, including warning messages displayed on Android devices. These warnings, according to the Informant, mislead users and harm the company’s reputation.
Additionally, payment-related warnings via Google Pay and restrictions on advertisements for RMG apps on Google Ads have further been highlighted as anti-competitive practices.
Key Allegations by Winzo Games
- Play Store Restrictions:
- Google prohibits the listing of skill-based RMG apps, compelling users to sideload such apps.
- Warning messages during sideloading and transactions tarnish the Informant’s market image.
- Selective Pilot Program:
- Google’s 2022 pilot program permitted only Daily Fantasy Sports (DFS) and Rummy apps on the Play Store, excluding other RMG apps.
- This selective inclusion allegedly created an uneven playing field.
- Advertising Policy:
- Google Ads allows promotions for DFS and Rummy but restricts advertisements for other RMGs.
- Such restrictions limit market access and visibility for developers like Winzo Games.
Google’s Defense
Google has defended its policies, citing legal complexities around real-money gaming in India, including diverse state laws and regulatory risks. The company stated that its pilot program aimed to better understand the Indian market, emphasizing that its ad policies align with legal requirements.
