Case Law Details
Case Name : Mathuraprasad C Pandey Vs Partiv Parikh (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mathuraprasad C Pandey Vs Partiv Parikh (NCLAT Delhi)
NCLAT Delhi held that as per provisions of section 31 of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Adjudicating Authority is empowered to either accept or reject the resolution plan. Adjudicating Authority is not empowered to modify/ alter the conditions in the resolution plan.
Facts-
The appellant, Nandish Patel, in the capacity of operational creditor filed the application u/s. 9 of the IBC Code which was admitted in the month of August, 2019 and Interim Resolution Professional namely Mr. Parthiv Parikh (IRP) was appointed as IRP. The prese...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
