Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mathuraprasad C Pandey Vs Partiv Parikh (NCLAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Company Appeal (AT)(Ins) No. 201/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/12/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mathuraprasad C Pandey Vs Partiv Parikh (NCLAT Delhi)

NCLAT Delhi held that as per provisions of section 31 of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Adjudicating Authority is empowered to either accept or reject the resolution plan. Adjudicating Authority is not empowered to modify/ alter the conditions in the resolution plan.

Facts-

The appellant, Nandish Patel, in the capacity of operational creditor filed the application u/s. 9 of the IBC Code which was admitted in the month of August, 2019 and Interim Resolution Professional namely Mr. Parthiv Parikh (IRP) was appointed as IRP. The present Respondent No.1, Mr. Parthiv Parikh was appointed as Resolution Professional by the Adjudicating Authority on 01.2020.

The plan submitted by the appellant M/s Mathura Prasad was approved by 97.79% of CoC. Whereas about 99% voting was made against liquidation of the Corporate Debtor.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031