Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nishi Kapoor Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nishi Kapoor Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The Assessing Officer who has valid jurisdiction over the case of the assessee shall record reasons u/s 148(2) for reassessment proceedings, otherwise issue of notice u/s 148 is not valid.  Reopening notice invalid If the officer who had issued the notice under section 148 of the Act, was different from the officer who had recorded the reasons and Assessment deserved to be quashed on this ground alone. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI  1.This appeal by assessee has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(Appeals)-Faridabad dated 21.01.2019 for AY 2010...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

I am S.K.Jain , Advocate practising in Income Tax , GST , Company Matters . The name of the concern is S.K. Jain and Co. and I am prop. of this concern . I am in practice for the last 30 years . Professionals and non professional can contact me for consutation on mail . My mail ID is skjain1147@gma View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment Void if Section 143(2) Notice Issued by Wrong Assessing Officer Draft Reply Challenging Reopening Based on Photocopy Evidence Time-Barred Assessment under Section 153C: Judicial Precedents Consolidated Satisfaction Note under Section 153C Held Invalid Draft Submissions: No Specific Default Date, No Section 271(1)(b) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930