This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
HC ask CBDT to Reconsider practice of appointing retired revenue officers as panel counsel
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax Central-I Vs M/s. Grasim Industries Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Principal CIT vs. Grasim Industries Ltd (Bombay High Court)
We understand that while appointing panel Advocates for the Revenue, the requirement of having practiced for some number of years is not insisted upon in case a person has domain expertise, such as retired Officers of Revenue. If this indeed be the practice, it would, in our view, need revisiting the same. This is so, as the skill and conduct required to appear as an Advocate, are honed by working in the chambers of an experienced Advocate, particularly that he is part of a system which seeks to ensure that Justice is achieved, beyond...
