No Revision U/s. 264 possible if Assessee Failed to point out mistake apparent on the face of record
Case Law Details
Case Name : Bali Trading (P) Ltd. Vs. Pr. CIT (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Madras High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bali Trading (P) Ltd. Vs. Pr. CIT (Madras High Court)
Settled legal principle is that the revision is not an appeal in disguise. The exercise of review jurisdiction could be done only if the applicant is able to point out an error, which is apparent on the face of the order. From the submissions made, this Court finds that the applicant has not been able to point out any error, which is apparent on the face of the order, but the attempt appears to be re-arguing the entire matter, which is impermissible.
FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT JUDGMENT / ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:-
Heard both.
2. This review ap...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

