Case Law Details
Same Deutz-Fahr India (P) Ltd. Vs Union of India (Madras High Court)
A The petitioner filed these writ petitions for the following reliefs:
i. . W.P. No. 32596 of 2017 has been filed challenging the Policy Circular issued by the second respondent which denies the Terminal Excise Duty (TED) refund contrary to policy provisions and Foreign Trade (Development and Regulations) Act, 1995.
ii. . W.P. Nos. 32597 and 32598 of 2017 have been filed challenging the rejection letter issued by the third respondent rejecting the claim for refund filed by the petitioner.
2. So far as W.P. No. 32596 of 2017, the petitioner, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner is willing to give up the challenge to the impugned Circular as their endeavor is only to request the respondents to consider their application for refund. Thus, recording the said submission, W.P. No. 32596 of 2017 is dismissed.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
