Goods cannot be seized for starting their journey a week after invoice date: HC

M/S Maa Vindhyavasini Tobacco Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) Heard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B.Tripathi, learned Special Counsel for the revenue. Sri Prem Shankar Prasad, Advocate has filed his appearance slip on behalf of the respondent no. 2, which is taken on record. The goods have been seized on two grounds, one being discrepancy in the quantity. That discrepancy has been resolved and it is accepted to the department that the quantity of goods as disclosed in the documents is the same as found on physical verification. The other gr...