Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ram Adhin Vs State Of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
In a case of circumstantial evidence, the conviction is not sustainable only on account of recovery of bloodstained articles from the accused unless there are other corroborative evidence. 1. The appellant has preferred this appeal against his conviction by the trial Court under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (‘the IPC’ in short) and sentence of life imprisonment and five years R.I., respectively for committing the murder of Shyamkaran (since deceased). 2. According to the prosecution, the deceased was working as Fire Watcher in the Forest Department. On  9.09.2003 ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930