Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ram Adhin Vs State Of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
In a case of circumstantial evidence, the conviction is not sustainable only on account of recovery of bloodstained articles from the accused unless there are other corroborative evidence. 1. The appellant has preferred this appeal against his conviction by the trial Court under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (‘the IPC’ in short) and sentence of life imprisonment and five years R.I., respectively for committing the murder of Shyamkaran (since deceased). 2. According to the prosecution, the deceased was working as Fire Watcher in the Forest Department. On  9.09.2003 ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930