Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate, Jalandhar Vs M/s Afcons Pauling Joint Venture (Punjab & Haryana High Court at Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
There was a divergent view of the various High Courts whether crushing of bigger stones or boulders into smaller pieces amounts to manufacture. In view of the divergent views, of the various High Courts, there was a bona fide doubt as to whether or not such an activity amounted to manufacture. This being the position, it cannot be said that merely because the appellants did not take out a licence and did not pay the duty the provisions of Section 11A got attracted. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.E.A. No. 23 of 2004 Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate, Jaland...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031