Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Sanjay Chhabra (Chandigarh High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 489 of 2005
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/03/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chandigarh
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
When the assessee fails to rebut the unexplained investment in the purchase of fruits, and the CIT(A) and Tribunal fail to record the fact that such entries were made in the books, the addition made by the AO is sustainable.
CIT Vs Sanjay Chhabra (Chandigarh High Court)- The sole point for consideration in this appeal is that once the Revenue had come to the conclusion that the assessee had made sales of apples amounting to Rs. 5,75,654/- to one Jagdish Chawla, whether it was the entire amount, or the 5% profit thereof, being commission on such sale, that was to be added to the income of the assessee.
According to the Revenue, the judgement of the Gujarat High Court reported in President Industries’s case (supra), was not applicable and the entire sale amount was asses-sable in the hands of the assessee. On the other hand, learned counsel for the assessee on the strength of the aforesaid decision argued that only 5% profit on the sale amount as commission was exigible to tax. 10. We find force in the contention of the learned counsel for the Revenue.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.