DCIT Haldwani Vs Shri Om Prakash Bhargava (ITAT Delhi) – Assessing Officer estimated the income on the basis of general information from Chief Agriculture Officer which was never confronted with assessee. Further such general information was with respect of earning from grain crop. But assessee was growing flowers and decorative plants which have been accepted by the revenue in past years. The assessee is holding the land of 24 bighas. Income of Rs.4,26,000/- have been accepted in the immediate preceding year, i.e. 2004-05. In this year, income from agriculture is only Rs.2,50,000/-. Considering all these relevant facts and the pleadings of the assessee, we find that the CIT(A) has rightly accepted the claim of the assessee and we sustain the same on the issue.
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
(DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI)
ITA No. 3633/Del. /2008
(Assessment year: 2005- 06)
DCIT, Circle, Haldwani. vs. Shri Om Prakash Bhargava
CO No.108/Del/2009
(in ITA No. 3633/Del./2008)
(Assessment year : 2005- 06)
Shri Om Prakash Bhargava, vs. DCIT, Circle,
ORDER
PER B.C. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The appeal filed by the revenue and the cross objection filed by the assessee arise out of the order of the CIT (Appeals)-II, Dehradun dated 25.9.2008. The grounds of revenue’s appeal read as under:-






