Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Fema / RBI

No Recall Without Sufficient Cause: Tribunal Rejects Bid to Set Aside Ex-Parte Benami Orders

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2026 taxguru.in 4395
Case Name
Visakh K. Vs SRS Mining (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA at Delhi)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

Visakh K. Vs SRS Mining (Appellate Tribunal Under SAFEMA at Delhi)

The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA dismissed the recall applications filed by M/s SRS Mining seeking to set aside earlier ex-parte orders passed in benami proceedings under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act (PBPTA). The Tribunal held that the Applicant failed to demonstrate “sufficient cause” for non-appearance, despite being granted multiple opportunities over an extended period.

The contention that absence was due to personal difficulties (illness and death in family) and negligence of counsel was rejected, as the Tribunal observed that other partners of the firm could have pursued the matter, and adequate time existed even after the stated events. It emphasized that recall jurisdiction requires proof that non-appearance was beyond the party’s control, which was not established in this case.

The Tribunal also clarified the distinction between recall and review, stating that recall is permissible only when there is denial of opportunity due to sufficient cause, whereas review requires an error apparent on record. The Applicant failed on both counts.

Further, the attempt to rely on a subsequent Supreme Court judgment (in a PMLA matter) was rejected, noting that it was not relevant to PBPTA proceedings and, in any case, was not brought on record in time.

Accordingly, finding no justification to interfere, the Tribunal refused to recall its earlier orders, leaving the Department’s appeal (allowing benami attachment) intact.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI

This Order disposes of the Applications I.A. Nos. MP-PBPT-917/CHN/2025 (Recall) dated 03.02.2025, MP-PBPT-918/CHN/ 2025 (Recall) dated 03.02.2025 and MP-PBPT-1286/CHN/2025 (Recall) dated 18.03.2025 have been filed by the Respondent/ Applicant M/s SRS Mining under Section 40 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act, 1988 (PBPTA) seeking Recall of the Orders dated 03.07.2024, 14.01.2025 and 30.01.2025 passed by this Tribunal. The Applicant has also filed an Application for taking certain additional documents on record.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 7,578

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.