Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Infinity International Vs NFAC (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Infinity International Vs NFAC (ITAT Ahmedabad) Unsigned Notice, No Jurisdiction: ITAT Ahmedabad Quashes Reassessments as Void ab initio The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee’s appeals for AYs 2014–15 and 2015–16, holding that the notices issued under section 148 were invalid as they were neither digitally signed nor manually signed by the issuing authority. This jurisdictional defect, admitted by the Revenue itself, was held to be fatal to the entire reassessment proceedings. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had produced copies of the section 148 notices issued through the ITBA sy...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Salary Taxable Only on Accrual, Not Mere Form 16 or 26AS Entries: Bengaluru ITAT Search Assessments Restored Despite Non-Compliance, Subject to ₹50,000 Cost: Bengaluru ITAT Section 270A Penalty Invalid Without Specific Charge: Bengaluru ITAT TDS Credit Denied Where Income Taxed in Another Entity’s Hands: ITAT Bangalore Foreign Tax Credit Can’t Be Denied for Technical Lapses if Form 67 Was Timely Filed: Bengaluru ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031