Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tarmo IT Services Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tarmo IT Services Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Partner’s Capital Introduction Cannot Be Taxed in Firm’s Hands – Section 68 Addition Deleted Delhi ITAT held that cash introduced by partners as capital cannot be assessed as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 in the hands of the partnership firm. The AO had made an addition of ₹52,00,000 u/s 68 on account of capital introduced by two partners, alleging inability to match earlier withdrawals with subsequent deposits. The addition was confirmed by NFAC-CIT(A). ITAT noted that it was an admitted fact that the impugned amounts were introduced by partners...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930