The economic situation owing to COVID-19 pandemic has seen an exponential increase in cyber-attacks across the globe and in particular, the financial sector. This situation has necessitated Regulators to re-look into their Cyber Security Guidelines applicable to all regulated entities in an effort to protect the financial systems.
AO, accordingly, took the view that each of the unit is separate house. Since deduction u/s 54F of the Act is not permitted, if the assessee is having more than one house property, the AO rejected the claim for deduction u/s 54F of the Act.
During the course of assessments the Assessing Officer found that the assessee claimed expenseunder the head ‘Assistance to Law Students’, and when asked, submitted that the assistance paid to law students Diksha Sharma and Krishna Prasad K. V. at Oxford is the justification for such claim.
Shri Praveen Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) As per facts of the present case, the assessee was student and studying for said period in Birla Institute of Technology as a regular student of M.Sc. Animation and Design and was tenant of Shri Abhishek Agarwal, who was into business of real estate in name and style […]
It is necessary to bring on record, to be taken care of by the CBDT, that present appeal has been filed just to generate unnecessary litigation without examining well-reasoned findings returned by the ld. CIT (A) which can be curtailed if proper scrutiny/vetting by the senior officers, who are at the helms of the affairs, is made before approving any case for filing appeal before a higher forum.
In re SI Air Springs Private Limited (GST AAR Taminadu) Whether ‘Air Springs’ manufactured and supplied by the applicant will be correctly classifiable under Tariff heading 40169990 as opposed to Tariff heading 8708 9900 and attract GST at the rate of 18%? In the case at hand, it is true that the products are for […]
Case No. AD-OI-46/2020 Initiation of anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of Polyurethane Leather which includes any kind of textile coated one sided or both sided with Polyurethane originating in or exported from China PR.
Madras HC in D.Y.Beathel Enterprises Vs State Tax Officer quashes GST orders due to non-examination of sellers and non-initiation of recovery action. Fresh enquiry ordered, emphasizing the seller’s accountability under Section 16 of CGST Act, 2017.
Addition of sum paid to Tata Sons Limited towards subscription paid for Brand Equity and Business Promotion Agreement was not justified as the said payment was made annually on a recurring basis for business purpose and the same was allowable as a revenue expense.
This GST Charcha deciphers into recent changes in GST Laws made vide Clause No. 104, 107, 110, 111 and 112 of the Finance Bill, 2021 with respect to amendments in Section 74, 107, 151, 152 and 168 of the CGST Act.
