Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kakanatil Abdul Rahiman Siraj Mather Vs ACIT (Kerala High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kakanatil Abdul Rahiman Siraj Mather Vs ACIT (Kerala High Court) 153C Satisfaction Is Jurisdictional — Kerala HC Sets Aside ITAT Order Remands Cases for Fresh Decision The Kerala High Court allowed a batch of appeals filed by the Assessee and remitted the matter back to the ITAT, Cochin Bench, holding that the Tribunal failed to properly examine the jurisdictional pre-condition of recording “satisfaction” u/s 153C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessments for AYs 2010-11 to 2014-15 were framed u/s 153C based on documents seized during a search on a third party. The Assessee contended ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930