"April, 1958" Archive

Obvious mistake of law cannot be rectified U/s. 154, while mistake apparent from record can be rectified

M. K. Venkatachalaivi, I.T.O and Another Vs Bombay Dyeing and Mfg. Co., Ltd. (Supreme Court of India)

Held, that the Income-tax Officer was justified in exercising his powers under s. 35 and rectifying the mistake. As a result of, the legal fiction about the retrospective operation of the Amendment Act, the subsequently inserted proviso must be read as....

Read More

Search Posts by Date

September 2020
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930