Raj Rekha challenges an order due to accountant’s oversight of GST notices. Madras HC permits contest with 10% pre-deposit. Analysis of the case.
Tvl. Jones Enterprises challenges tax liability for non-response to show cause notices. Madras HC permits contest with 10% pre-deposit. Detailed analysis.
Madras High Court directs to condone 21 days’ delay in GST appeal, citing lack of satisfaction of Section 74. Full judgment analysis included.
Delhi High Court ruling states Income Tax Dept. must permit personal hearing through National Faceless Assessment Centre upon assessee’s request. Full text judgment provided.
Read the detailed analysis of Computer Modelling Group Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi) regarding interest leviable from the assessee for short payment of tax due to payer’s TDS default before FY 2012-2013.
Read the detailed analysis of Delhi High Court’s judgment upholding the release of attached properties after acquittal in the predicate offence. Full text included.
Delhi High Court sets aside CCI’s order, ruling that penal interest can’t be imposed without following proper procedure. Detailed analysis of Geep Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors Vs Competition Commission of India.
Gujarat High Court’s judgment clarifies the 12% GST levy on mango pulp. Analysis of the case Vimal Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Union of India & Ors.
In Tvl. B.L. Collection Vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Madras High Court allows contesting GST demand due to cancer diagnosis, requiring 10% pre-deposit. Full judgment included.
Section 107(11) provides wide-ranging powers to the appellate authority to modify orders passed under Section 130(2) by the adjudicating authority. It emphasized that as long as the appellate authority’s decision is based on relevant considerations and is not manifestly unjust or unreasonable, the court has limited scope to interfere with its discretion.
