section 195 judiciary-2

Depreciation allowable on non-compete fees: HC

PCIT Vs Ferromatic Milacron India Pvt Ltd (Gujarat High Court)

Where non-resident agents appointed by assessee for procuring export orders did not have permanent establishment in India and their activities as commission agents are being carried out outside India, merely because a portion of the sale to the overseas purchasers took place in India, would not make assessee liable to deduct tax at source...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax |

Payment to parent company for copyrighted software on principle to principle basis cannot be treated royalty

Aveva Information Technology India (P) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Payment to parent company for copyrighted software on principle to principle basis cannot be treated royalty and TDS not applicable on payment to parent company not having PE in India....

Read More

Section 195(1) & 40(a)(ia) talks about tax deduction where sum is chargeable to tax

JLC Electromet Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Jaipur)

Coming to the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act, the said section also provides that any interest, royalty, fees for technical services or other sum chargeable under this Act on which tax is deductible at source under chapter XVII-B and such tax has not been deducted or after deduction has not been paid on or before the due date ...

Read More

Section 206AA not override provisions of section 90(2)

DCIT Vs BEML Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore)

Section 206AA does not override provisions of section 90(2) and in case of payment made to non-resident, assessee correctly applied rate of tax prescribed under concerned DTAAs and not as per section 206AA because provisions of the DTAAs were more beneficial and DTAA acquired primacy in such case....

Read More

No TDS on Commission to non-resident agents for procuring export orders

Punjab Stainless Steel Inds. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

Commission paid to foreign agents for procuring export orders could not be treated as income taxable in India when parameters of DTAAs were applied to transactions in question. Also non-resident agents did not have PE or business connection in India. Therefore, impugned payment could not be held as taxable in the hands of non-resident age...

Read More

No TDS u/s 195 on payment of buying agency commission to non-resident

M/s. Adidas India Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Consideration paid by assessee for services rendered by non-resident were purely in the nature of procurement services and could not be characterized as ‘managerial’, ‘technical’ or ‘consultancy’ services and thus, could not be classified as fee for technical services and accordingly, not liable for deduction of tax at source ...

Read More

Referral fees to foreign concern for introducing clients is not a fee for technical services

M/s Knight Frank (India) (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Services rendered by foreign concern for introducing a client did not make-available any technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes to assessee, therefore, related payment did not fall within the realm of "Fees for included services" as envisaged in Article 12 of the Indo-US, DTAA and payment made to foreign concern con...

Read More

Fees for included services taxable only if technical knowledge made available

PCIT Vs EGL Eagle Global Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Punjab and Haryana HC)

In view of Section 90(2) of the Act and clause 4(b) of Article 12 of the Treaty, the provisions of this Act would stand applicable only where fees for included services taxable only if there is a make available technical knowledge. In the case in hand finding of fact that has been returned by the ITAT, there is no make available of the te...

Read More

Retrospective amendment cannot change tax withholding liability, with retrospective effect

DCIT Vs Amol Dicalite Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Retrospective amendment in law does change tax liability in respect of an income, with retrospective effect, but it cannot change tax withholding liability, with retrospective effect....

Read More

TDS on Commission to foreign agents having No PE in India for services rendered outside India

Vimta Labs Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

ITAT held that the business receipts of the foreign residents are not taxable in India since the agents have no PE in India and therefore, the assessee was not required to make TDS u/s 195 of the Act. Therefore, the assessee’s appeals for all the three A.Ys are allowed....

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,438)
Company Law (5,279)
Custom Duty (7,558)
DGFT (4,090)
Excise Duty (4,317)
Fema / RBI (3,944)
Finance (4,105)
Income Tax (31,600)
SEBI (3,295)
Service Tax (3,506)

Search Posts by Date

January 2020
« Dec