Income Tax : Understand Section 194S of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Learn about TDS on transfer of virtual digital assets (VDA), thresholds, tax ...
Corporate Law : In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court clarified that an overt act by unlawful assembly members suffices for murder charges under...
Income Tax : Delve into the provisions of Income Tax Act Sections 153A & 153C, governing assessments after search or requisition. Learn from co...
Income Tax : Explore the intricacies of the time limits for issuing notices under Section 149 of the Income Tax Department with this article. F...
Income Tax : Reading a decision is one thing and interpreting the same is another, isn’t it? Many times, verdict of the decisions written its...
Income Tax : Read the detailed analysis of Karrm Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT at ITAT Mumbai. Learn why ITAT ruled that non-filing of GST b...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court rules that reassessment actions post-2021 searches must meet the First Proviso to Section 149(1) of the Income Ta...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court deems CBDT's refusal to condone delay in filing revised ITR by CG Power post-NCLT order unreasonable. Detailed a...
Custom Duty : Madras High Court directs Customs to dispose of Aditya International Ltd's request for CVD exemption amendment on silk imports wit...
Custom Duty : Once a export benefit under which shipping bill was filed has been availed, the conversion to any other scheme cannot be allowed a...
Custom Duty : Learn how to file and process Bill of Entry amendments at Jawahar Lal Nehru Custom House. Get insights on self-approval and office...
Karnataka High Court held that Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) should formulate a suitable mechanism to digitize Khata / Katha certificates so as to avoid situations like issuance of Katha in respect of one same property to two different person.
CESTAT Delhi held that that refund has to be granted to the respondent as the order for amendment in the Bills of Entry had attained finality.
Reassessment initiated beyond 4 years was quashed as assessee had disclosed the information with regard to the sale of the agricultural land and all the particulars with regard to sale of agricultural land was disclosed before AO in full extent and there was no failure on the part of assessee with regard to providing material facts and the notice issued under Section 148 and 149 of the Act for re-opening assessment.
Explore the intricacies of the time limits for issuing notices under Section 149 of the Income Tax Department with this article. Find out the three-year limit and conditions specified for issuing such notices.
Delhi High Court held that notice for reopening of assessment issued u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act on the last date of the limitation period cannot be said be have been issued beyond the period of limitation.
Appellant’s conviction for the offence punishable under Section 302, read with Section 34 of IPC was set aside as there was no material to prove the existence of common intention which was the necessary ingredient of Section 34 of IPC.
Held that the importer is allowed to choose the more beneficial provision and cannot be forced to opt for / follow the non-beneficial provision. Accordingly, the goods in question Peas [Pisum Sativum] was present both in Sl No.20 and Sl No.20A of the basic Notification No.50/2017 Cus dated 30.6.2017 and hence assessee eligible to avail benefit of NIL rate of BCD.
In a case involving Anand Persad Jaiswal, ITAT Delhi ruled that interest income earned by a non-resident Indian (NRI) from a foreign bank is not taxable in India under section 5(2) of the Income Tax Act.
Madras High Court held that initiation of proceedings for reassessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act based on material already on record and without new/ tangible information is bad-in-law and liable to be quashed.
Delhi High Court held that amendment of shipping bill u/s 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 allowed based on the documentary evidences which was in existence at the time the goods were exported.
