Income Tax : Explore tax implications under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) and reassessment norms in property transactions. Judicial rulings emphasize e...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai invalidates reassessment against Shah Rukh Khan for FY 2012-13, addressing foreign tax credit claims and procedural fl...
Income Tax : Learn about Income Tax Act Section 147 assessment proceedings: reasons for reopening, notice issuance, objections, assessment proc...
Income Tax : Budget 2025 revises block assessment rules for search cases, covering undisclosed income, assessment procedures, penalties, and ti...
Income Tax : Under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, reassessment cannot be based on a mere change of opinion by the AO. Read more on this leg...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time bar...
Income Tax : Madras High Court held that the existence of an alternative remedy precludes the petitioner from approaching this Court through a...
Income Tax : Calcutta High Court held that liberty is granted to the petitioner to respond to notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax...
Income Tax : Tribunal also took note of the fact that AO had merely reproduced identical reasons for multiple years without verifying facts or ...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that department have acted contrary to the SOP under section 144B of the Income Tax Act violating the princ...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act based on incorrect facts and incorrect record...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 29/2024-Central Excise rescinds six 2022 excise notifications in the public interest, effective immediately. Deta...
Income Tax : Learn how to initiate proceedings under section 147 of the IT Act in e-Verification cases. Detailed instructions for Assessing Off...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
ITAT Pune condones delay, remands Sujit Taware’s assessment to AO for fresh adjudication on cash deposit and property purchase.
ITAT Pune deletes capital gains addition u/s 2(47) as possession wasn’t transferred under development agreement.
ITAT Delhi quashes reassessment in Nikita Mahajan case, citing incorrect jurisdiction and mechanical approval. Learn about the key details of the decision.
ITAT Ahmedabad overturns addition, accepts assessee’s joint agricultural income claim. Case details and ITAT order summary provided.
ITAT Ahmedabad allows co-operative societies deduction under 80P for interest earned from co-operative bank deposits.
ITAT acknowledged the taxpayer’s claim under Section 54F, despite its late submission, and instructed the AO to verify the claim and provide appropriate relief. The ITAT cited a jurisdictional High Court ruling that allows taxpayers to raise additional claims, provided they are legitimate.
ITAT Jaipur remands case on S.40A(3) non-compliance to CIT(A), imposing Rs. 2,000 cost for assessee’s non-compliance. (158 Characters)
Madras High Court disposed of the writ petition with direction to petitioner to challenge the impugned Assessment Order as well as Rectification Order before Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)].
ITAT Hyderabad held that re-assessment under section 148 merely based on borrowed satisfaction, without any independent verification and application of mind, is invalid and liable to be quashed. Accordingly, notice u/s. 148 and consequent order quashed.
Madras High Court held that re-opening u/s. 148 read with section 147 of the Income Tax Act not sustained as there is no failure on the part of assessee to fully and truly disclosure all the material facts. Thus, notice and order quashed.
