Section 144C - Page 3

Payment towards interconnectivity utility charges from Indian customers not taxable as Royalty

Al Telekom Austria Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)

ITAT Bangalore held that payments received towards interconnectivity utility charges from Indian customers / end users cannot be considered as Royalty to be brought to tax in India under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act and also as per DTAA....

Fees for live and non-live transmission right not taxable as royalty

Cricket Australia Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi held that as there is no copyright on live events, the license fees for live and non-live transmission right cannot be taxed as royaty in terms of section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, addition deleted....

AO not empowered to withdraw or modify or substitute assessment order passed by him

DCIT Vs Mondon Investments (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi held that law does not confer any power on the Assessing Officer to either withdraw or modify or substitute one assessment order passed by him earlier with another assessment order subsequently....

Specified domestic transactions adjustment invalid after 01.04.2017

Relaxo Footwear Ltd. Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Delhi)

Finance Act, 2017 removed clause (i) of section 92BA, effectively nullifying any decisions made by the Assessing Officer under this section. Reference to the TPO under section 92CA also becomes invalid...

Software licence fee reimbursement not taxable as no Permanent Establishment in India

GE Precision Healthcare LLC Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi held that software licence fee received as reimbursement, in absence of a Permanent Establishment in India, is not taxable. Accordingly, addition towards the same deleted....

Only assessee can sign Form number 35A prescribed under Income Tax (Dispute Resolution Panel) Rules, 2009

Bridge India Fund Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

In present facts of the case, it was observed by the Tribunal that only Assessee could sign Form number 35A prescribed under Income Tax (Dispute Resolution Panel) Rules, 2009....

Communication relating to assessments, appeals, orders without DIN are null & void

Hardik Rao Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

In present facts of the case, the Tribunal held that Assessment Order issued without DIN is null and void as it is in violation of CBDT Circular No. 19/2019 dated 1 4th August, 2019....

Disallowance of staff welfare expenditure resorting to adhoc base unsustainable

ACIT Vs Mitsui & Co. India Pvt Ltd (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi held that disallowance of staff welfare expenditure on the adhoc basis unsustainable as AO failed to establish as to who the expenses are not incurred for business purpose....

ITAT allows Section 54 Deduction Not Claimed in Original or Revised Return

Late Gurdip Singh Kapur Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi permits a Section 54 deduction that wasn't claimed in original or revised returns. The case highlights the powers of appellate authorities....

Cost reimbursement for support services taxable as Fees for Technical Services

Kraft Heinz Foods Company Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that cost reimbursement received towards providing support services is taxable as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) both under Section 9(1) (vii) of the Act as well as Article 12(4) of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement....

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (6,763)
Company Law (9,802)
Corporate Law (13,018)
Custom Duty (10,576)
DGFT (5,113)
Excise Duty (5,580)
Fema / RBI (5,653)
Finance (6,358)
Income Tax (48,804)
SEBI (5,247)
Service Tax (4,845)