Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that disallowance of agricultural expenses based on estimation is unsustainable without concrete evidence, rul...
Income Tax : Understand the implications of receiving a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. Learn how to respond, time limits, a...
Income Tax : Article discusses about Order which can be rectified under section 154 of Income Tax Act, 1961, Rectification of Income Tax order ...
Income Tax : Explore the implications of taxation under section 115BBE, including misuse of sections 68 to 69D, consequences of high tax rates,...
Income Tax : Every taxpayer has to furnish the details of his income to the Income-tax Department. These details are to be furnished by filing ...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Karnataka High Court held that settlement commission, accepting additional income offered as reasonable and giving immunity from p...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune restored the assessment order as assessee neither filed any evidence nor provided material in an attempt to discharge th...
Income Tax : Rajasthan HC upholds penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for unexplained cash deposits after withdrawals. ...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that the condition of make available was not satisfied for services when provided by assessee did not enabled the ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune directed addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unsecured loans as appellate deliberately withhold information f...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Delhi held that revisional jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act not invocable in absence of any error or infirmity in the assessment order which could make the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue.
Kerala High Court upholds dismissal of income tax appeal due to 115-day delay, citing lack of evidence for website glitches.
ITAT Bangalore overturns PCIT’s directive to disallow 80P deduction without proper claim, emphasizing lack of error prejudicial to revenue.
Twinings Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT: ITAT Kolkata allows gratuity payment as salary expense u/s 37(1) of IT Act, rejecting disallowance u/s 36(1)(v).
ITAT Delhi remits WLD Investments Pvt Ltd’s case back to AO for fresh assessment on loss and interest disallowance issues, emphasizing fair reassessment.
Read how ITAT Mumbai upheld the deletion of an addition due to discrepancies between Form 26AS and the Profit & Loss Account in the case of ACIT Vs BBH Communications India Pvt Ltd.
Delhi High Court rules that inadequate inquiry by AO doesn’t justify revision under Section 263, reinforcing principles of fair and judicious tax assessment.
Delhi ITAT rules against assessment order and notice of demand without Document Identification Number (DIN), emphasizing adherence to CBDT Circular No.19/2019.
Delhi High Court decrees no income addition without rejecting books of accounts in PCIT Vs Forum Sales Pvt. Ltd., upholding ITAT’s decision.
ITAT Delhi rules against penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for inaccurate income particulars from property sale, emphasizing legal and factual clarity.
