MVAT judiciary-2

Bombay HC refers matter of 10% Mandatory deposit under MVAT to Larger Bench

United Projects Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)

The petitioners are aggrieved by the refusal of registration of their appeals filed under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act since they have not deposited the ten per cent of the disputed amount now mandated under the amended provision of Section 26 of the Act. They have challenged the validity of the amended provisions and the legislati...

Read More

Repeal of VAT Act – Savings clause saves all rules, regulations, orders, notifications, etc

Magma Fincorp Limited Vs State of Maharashtra & Anr. (Bombay High Court)

Magma Fincorp Limited Vs State of Maharashtra & Anr. (Bombay High Court) Section 78 of Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Related Laws (Amendments, Validation and Savings) Act, 2017, which saves Section 64 of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 is constitutionally valid. Bombay High Court has held that by virtue of Section 78 of Sta...

Read More

HC directs dept to consider claim for issuance of ‘C’ Form on purchase of natural gas from Gujrat

Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra and Another (Bombay High Court)

Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs State of  Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) The Petitioner’s grievance is that the Respondents are not issuing Form C in respect of its purchase of natural gas from Gujrat. This is used in the manufacture of polyester staple fibre. Primarily, the contention of the Petitioner is that the sam...

Read More

Classification of Hybrid Amplifier for MVAT: Under Accessory of Cable T.V. or general electronic item?

The Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs M/s Khush Bhakht Electronic Engineers Pvt.Ltd. (Bombay High Court)

The Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs M/s Khush Bhakht Electronic Engineers Pvt.Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and on a true and correct interpretation of schedule entries C-II-124 and C-II-126, appended to the Bombay Sales Tax Act 1959, the Tribunal was legally justified in holding the impugned pro...

Read More

3% Tax Rate benefit under MVAT Act cannot be given prior to 14.10.2017

Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. Vs The State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)

Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. Vs The State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) The only question that we have to consider is whether this concessional rate of duty could be availed of by the petitioner from 24.08.2017 to 13.10.2017. The intervening period where the taxable person under MGST Act does not continue to...

Read More

MVAT: No Input Tax Credit on Goods not Resold within 6 Month period

Axis Mutual Fund Vs The State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)

During the course of assessment, the assessing authority has alleged that the petitioner is not eligible to claim any input tax credit as the goods purchased by the petitioner on which input tax credit is claimed are not resold within a period of six months from the date of purchase. Such allegation was raised based on the special provisi...

Read More

Port Trust is a dealer liable to sales tax under Bombay Sales Tax Act 1954: HC

The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay Vs. The State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)

judgment of the Supreme Court in Cochin Port Trust holds the field. We are accordingly of the view that the Port Trust falls within the definition of dealer and is liable to sales tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act 1954....

Read More

Bombay HC on inclusion of insurance and carrying charges in ‘Sale Price’

The Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. M/s. Ravi Trading Company (Bombay High Court)

A division bench of the Bombay High Court, on Monday, held that insurance charges and carrying charges do not form part of the sale price under section 2(29) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. A bench comprising Justices R.K Deshpande and Manish Pitale was hearing a departmental appeal against the order of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribun...

Read More

SC Upheld validity of MVAT (Levy, Amendment and Validation) Act, 2009

Eurotex Industries and Exports Limited Vs State of Maharashtra & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)

SC upheld constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax (Levy, Amendment and Validation) Act, 2009 which amended certain provisions in the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) with retrospective effect from April 01, 2005. ...

Read More

Railway catering services not exempt from sales tax: Bombay HC

Union of India Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. (Bombay High Court)

The only contention and which has prevailed throughout is that the departmental catering service being a property of the Union of India through General Manager, Western Railway, it squarely falls within the exemption provision and particularly carved out by Article 285 of the Constitution of India. That exempts property of the Union from ...

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (4,355)
Company Law (5,149)
Custom Duty (7,478)
DGFT (4,044)
Excise Duty (4,275)
Fema / RBI (3,891)
Finance (4,048)
Income Tax (31,160)
SEBI (3,237)
Service Tax (3,478)

Search Posts by Date

November 2019
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930